Ossity
is our latest product. It's a search hub and web research tool. Try it now for free!
This page has been Textised!
The original page address was https://juicystudio.com/services/readability.php?url=nalogiexpert.ru/vychety/nalogovyj-vychet-materi-odinochke-v-2022-dokumenty-kuda-podavat-zayavlenie.html
For sharing use https://tinyurl.com/22t8dop5
Here are some options:
- Back to original page (in this window
|
in a new window)
- Convert this page to a PDF
- Print this page
- Textise Home Page (full version
|
text only version)
- Textise Options Page (choose font size, font colour, etc.)
Are you a webmaster? Find out how to
easily add Textise to your web site
.
[Image: Juicy Studio]
Readability Test
You are here:
Home
Quality Assurance
Readability Test
Site Navigation
Contents
Readability Tests
Test the Readability of a Website
Interpreting the Results
Readability Results
Gunning-Fog Index
Flesch Reading Ease
Flesch-Kincaid grade level
Reading Level Algorithms
Further Reading
Readability Tests
Gunning Fog, Flesch Reading Ease, and Flesch-Kincaid are
reading level algorithms
that can be helpful in determining how readable your content is. Reading level algorithms only provide a rough guide, as they tend to reward short sentences made up of short words. Whilst they're rough guides, they can give a useful indication as to whether you've pitched your content at the right level for your intended audience.
[
Back to the contents
]
Test the Readability of a Website Website address
URI
[
Back to the contents
]
Interpreting the Results
This service analyses the readability of all rendered content. Unfortunately, this will include navigation items, and other short items of content that do not make up the part of the page that is intended to be the subject of the readability test. These items are likely to skew the results. The difference will be minimal in situations where the copy content is much larger than the navigation items, but documents with little content but lots of navigation items will return results that aren't correct.
Philip Chalmers of
Benefit from IT
provided the following typical Fog Index scores, to help ascertain the readability of documents.
Typical Fog Index Scores Fog Index Resources 6 TV guides, The Bible, Mark Twain 8 Reader's Digest 8 - 10 Most popular novels 10 Time, Newsweek 11 Wall Street Journal 14 The Times, The Guardian 15 - 20 Academic papers Over 20 Only government sites can get away with this, because you can't ignore them. Over 30 The government is covering something up
[
Back to the contents
]
Readability Results
The following table contains the readability results for
http://nalogiexpert.ru/vychety/nalogovyj-vychet-materi-odinochke-v-2022-dokumenty-kuda-podavat-zayavlenie.html
.
Reading Level Results Summary Value Total sentences 294 Total words 1859 Average words per Sentence 6.32 Words with 1 Syllable 1813 Words with 2 Syllables 14 Words with 3 Syllables 14 Words with 4 or more Syllables 18 Percentage of word with three or more syllables 1.72% Average Syllables per Word 1.05 Gunning Fog Index 3.22 Flesch Reading Ease 100.00 Flesch-Kincaid Grade 0.00 Gunning-Fog Index
The following is the algorithm to determine the Gunning-Fog index.
Calculate the average number of words you use per sentence.
Calculate the percentage of difficult words in the sample (words with three or more syllables).
Add the totals together, and multiply the sum by 0.4.
Algorithm: (average_words_sentence + number_words_three_syllables_plus) * 0.4
The result is your Gunning-Fog index, which is a rough measure of how many years of schooling it would take someone to understand the content. The lower the number, the more understandable the content will be to your visitors. Results over seventeen are reported as seventeen, where seventeen is considered post-graduate level.
[
Back to the contents
]
Flesch Reading Ease
The following is the algorithm to determine the Flesch Reading Ease.
Calculate the average number of words you use per sentence.
Calculate the average number of syllables per word.
Multiply the average number of syllables per word multiplied by 84.6 and subtract it from the average number of words multiplied by 1.015.
Subtract the result from 206.835.
Algorithm: 206.835 - (1.015 * average_words_sentence) - (84.6 * average_syllables_word)
The result is an index number that rates the text on a 100-point scale. The higher the score, the easier it is to understand the document. Authors are encouraged to aim for a score of approximately 60 to 70.
[
Back to the contents
]
Flesch-Kincaid grade level
The following is the algorithm to determine the Flesch-Kincaid grade level.
Calculate the average number of words you use per sentence.
Calculate the average number of syllables per word.
Multiply the average number of words by 0.39 and add it to the average number of syllables per word multiplied by 11.8.
Subtract 15.50 from the result.
Algorithm: (0.39 * average_words_sentence) + (11.8 * average_syllables_word) - 15.9
The result is the Flesch-Kincaid grade level. Like the Gunning-Fog index, it is a rough measure of how many years of schooling it would take someone to understand the content. Negative results are reported as zero, and numbers over twelve are reported as twelve.
[
Back to the contents
]
Reading Level Algorithms
Readability is the measure of how easy it is to read and comprehend a document. Readability tests were first developed in the 1920s in the United States. They are mathematical formulas, designed to determine the suitability of books for American students at a certain age, or grade level. Automating the process was intended to make it easier for tutors, librarians, and publishers to determine whether a book would be suitable for its intended audience. The formulas are based around the average words to a sentence, and the average syllables used per word. As such, they tend to reward short sentences made up of short words.
Being mathematically based, readability tests are unable to determine the likelihood that the document is comprehensible, interesting, or enjoyable. It's possible to obtain good readability scores with gobbledygook, providing the content contains short sentences made up of monosyllabic words. We'll leave the question as to why the word "monosyllabic" has five syllables for another day. Layout and design are also important factors to the readability of a document that cannot be determined using readability tests. Documents aimed at a higher level may require background knowledge, which cannot be determined by the tests.
For a document to be easily understood, the writing style should be clear and simple. This involves a writing style that is direct, and familiar to the intended reader. The structure of the document should be logical, unambiguous, and avoid redundant words.
Many of these factors cannot be measured using readability tests. Instead, readability tests provide a prediction of the reading ease for a document. Sentence length and polysyllabic words do have a direct impact on the readability of documents, albeit a surface measure of the characteristics of the text. They provide an indication that the content may be too dense with a quantifiable measure. The results should be used in conjunction with
good writing style
guidelines.
Guideline 14
of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines requires that documents are clear and simple. Readability tests can provide a rough guide to the likelihood of a document being clearly understood. This service is to provide content authors with a guide to the readability of their website.
[
Back to the contents
]
Further Reading
Edit Central readability
[
Back to the contents
]
Search Criteria
Site Navigation
Main Content
Switch to High Contrast
Home
Quality Assurance
Articles Archive
Privacy Statement
Syndication
Atom 1.0
Textise: Back to top
This text-only page was created by Textise (
www.textise.net
) © Textise - CPC LLC
To find out more about our product,
visit Textise.org
.